Showing posts with label Voter ID Laws. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Voter ID Laws. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

The G(OP)rinch that Stole Democracy

      This morning, in front of my foggy bathroom mirror, I try once again to enunciate the phrase I've had trouble saying without a shudder now for more than a month, “President-elect T-tr-tr-um . . .”
      Don't worry. I'll get it right some day. But, I still wonder, why did just enough Americans in the right states pick a former-reality TV star with no experience in government to be the 45th President of the United States?
      Is it FBI Director Comey's fault? Or, perhaps, the blame lies with Russian hackers? Or fake news? Or uneducated whites? Or, maybe, it's the fault of our anachronistic and undemocratic Electoral College?
      Take your pick. They've all been written about extensively, but one reason hasn't received nearly enough attention. That the winning party, the Republicans, has been involved in a long-term, well-funded project, not to steal Christmas like the Grinch – that would be small potatoes – but American democracy, itself.
      This project can be traced back to corporate lawyer and future Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell's infamous 1971 memo, a reveille, not for radicals, but for big business to organize against – well, us, the people. Powell laid it all out, calling for “careful long-range planning and implementation,” backed by a “scale of financing available only through joint effort.”
      As chronicled in Jane Mayer's essential Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right, a handful of right-wing billionaires, the Kochs, the Scaifes, the Olins, the DeVoses, and a few others took up Lewis Powell's clarion call and have worked tirelessly over many years to turn our country rightward. To install a government to do their biding, to allow their companies the liberty to rook the suckers with impunity and pollute our air and water without the interference of pointy-headed bureaucrats.
      They have poured billions of dollars into a dizzying array of think tanks, foundations, and action committees. They've bought off media and universities. In fact, they've even founded their own media, with their own set of “facts.”
      Meanwhile, with gobs of ready cash, the right-wing funded the Federalist Society and bought their way into America's law schools to turn the courts and the country rightward. And their hard work has paid off handsomely.
      In 2010, the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling made our politicians even more reliant on the top 1%, whose interests are diametrically opposed to most Americans. But not stopping there, in 2013, Republican-appointed judges on the Supreme Court defanged the Voting Rights Act.
      Since then, Republican state legislatures have passed voter ID laws and purged voter rolls in order to deny their fellow citizens, mostly Democrats, their precious right to vote.
      As Mehdi Hasan explained inThe Washington Post, in North Carolina, “[on] the eve of the election, a federal judge said she was 'horrified' by the 'insane' process by which people were 'being purged' from the voter rolls. In July, a three-judge panel ruled that the state’s 2013 voting law could only be explained by 'discriminatory intent'” because it was obviously aimed at keeping African Americans from voting.
      This “systematic disenfranchisement,” according to political reporters Alice Ollstein and Kira Lerner, “was intentional and politically motivated. In the years leading up to 2016, Republican governors and state legislatures implemented new laws restricting when, where, and how people could vote — laws that disproportionately harmed students, the poor, and people of color. In several instances, lawmakers pushing such policies said explicitly that their goal was suppression of voters who favor the Democratic Party.”
      As Zachary Roth succinctly put it inThe Great Suppression: Voting Rights, Corporate Cash, and the Conservative Assault on Democracy, “At its core, this bold campaign has amounted to nothing less than an effort to undermine democracy.”
      It's worth noting that Republicans originally got into the driver's seat in battleground states because in 2010 they used every trick in the book and then some to win majorities in order to gerrymander their way to more and more power during the decennial redistricting, regardless of their minority status.
      In 2010, they blanketed districts with libelous mailers, shamelessly sliming their Democratic opponents. Then having won, they redrew districts with laser-like precision by using a computer program called Maptitude. In Ohio, Republicans were able to win 75% of U.S. House seats with just 51% of the vote. In Pennsylvania, according to Dave Daley's accurately-named Ratf**ked: The True Story Behind the Secret Plan to Steal America's Democracy, Pennsylvania Republicans won 72% of the House seats with only 49% of the vote.
      So by hijacking the courts; using computer programs to ruthlessly redistrict and thus, to effectively disenfranchise so many voters; and by then passing voter ID laws while purging voter rolls, all to keep Democratic constituencies from exercising their right to vote, the Republicans have blatantly stolen American democracy in order to seize power.
      Republicans now control both the executive and legislative branches of the federal government. And very soon, after a new right-wing justice is appointed, they will control all 3 branches of the federal government.
      This naked thievery of our democracy has been in reality a slow-motion coup that has led directly to the election of a rich vulgarian unfit by both temperament and experience to be the 45th President of the United States and, also, to me, still sadly standing in front of my foggy bathroom mirror, trying not to choke on my own words.

Saturday, December 13, 2014

Being Raked over Coals

     It might seem strange to enjoy being raked over the coals for my political writings, but I always count it an honor of sorts. Here's a link to a libertarian-leaning lawyer's blog post that zeroed in on my most recent piece in The FW Weekly. http://right-winggenius.blogspot.com/2014/12/contrarian-view-low-voter-turnout-isnt.html
     Interesting stuff. Of course, nothing will ever compare (knock on wood) with the shellacking I got on the Free Republic site after my piece in the FW Star-Telegram about how undemocratic our Constitution is. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/921320/posts?page=55 Good times!
 
    Below is my reply to Adam Arrington:

Mr. Arrington,

Thank you for reading my piece in the FW Weekly. I appreciate any and all feedback. And I suppose it's sort of an honor to be raked over the coals, whether those coals are red-hot or day-old cold.  We obviously disagree, but I commend you, for the most part, for your tone, which is less personal invective than substantive disagreements. So let's get to that . . .
  
I'm always more than a little surprised how any one who looks at the facts objectively can defend voter suppression, regardless of their political persuasion. The voter ID laws that have proliferated across the country in the past few years originally came from ALEC, a right-wing group. The bills ostensibly address an issue -- in-person voter impersonation --  that is extremely rare. The true purpose is obvious: to suppress voters who would vote for Democrats, and it's worked remarkably well.

The GAO released a report in September of this year that the voter ID laws in Kansas and Tennessee  suppressed the vote by about 2%, correlating pretty closely to earlier estimates from statistician Nate Silver. I think conservative Judge Richard A. Posner has put it best: "There is only one motivation for imposing burdens on voting that are ostensibly designed to discourage voter-impersonation fraud,and that is to discourage voting by persons likely to vote against the party responsible for imposing the burdens." As he points out, the laws are "highly correlated with a state's having a Republican governor and Republican control of the legislature and appear to be aimed at limiting voting by minorities, particularly blacks." And  your link about the noncitizens voting is unconvincing, as well. To say that something is possible, a high percentage of noncitizens voting, is not to prove anything, really.

Politics ain't beanbag, and Republicans play for keeps. I, for one, admire them for that.That said, I don't think voting should be a partisan issue.

I also can not abide your idea, as attractive as I'm sure it is to you, that Republicans are smarter, more attractive, and have straighter teeth than the dim-witted Democrats. I don't think either party can honestly claim a monopoly or near-monopoly on misinformed voters. Most people are busy with their lives, which, for most people, includes kids, work, long commutes, money-problems of one sort or another, and hanging on to what sanity they were born with. In as depoliticized a society as ours it's little wonder that most people don't follow what passes for political discourse in this country. One side thinking the other side are idiots is normal, I suppose, but both sides have their share of ill-informed voters pulling the lever for them.

In 2016, I think it somewhat likely that the country will elect a Republican President. If history is our guide, then Republicans will lose in the midterms of 2018. I predict that you will not think those voters are la creme de la creme, as you purport to believe now.

Mr. Arrington, I count it an honor that you took the time to attack my work. I always tell everyone that the writing I've done for the Weekly has kept me out of the bars -- well, at least for the most part. Here's hoping it did the same for you. And I'm glad it provided you some raw material to stake out and defend your own political positions.

Take care.

Ken Wheatcroft-Pardue