Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Before Boredom was Invented

 (Blogger's note: This is the original version of what the FW Weekly published last week.)
   
     When I was a child back in the sixties, summer in Houston's suburbs was endless and sometimes dangerous. Boredom, you see, had not yet been invented. We did not have the ability then to store thousands of songs or have inventions that regurgitated those songs with all the clarity of a gramophone. We did not yet have at our fingertips hundreds of TV stations playing nonstop reruns. And we did not possess cellphones that took really, really bad pictures. Yet our lives were still worth living, believe it or not.
      One languid summer afternoon, when my father was at work and my mother had taken to bed for the duration, as we used to say, with strict instructions that we not wake her unless we were pretty damn sure St. John of Patmos' Revelation was being fulfilled and Jesus Christ himself was returning robed in clouds of glory to separate the sheep from the goats, I got an idea.
      I made up my mind to wire some old radios together. We had a pile of them, rectangular, Bauhaus-like, boxy white, black, or brown clock radios with knobs and clock hands, total anachronisms now. Today's high-tech whizzes wouldn't be able to turn one on, let alone tell time.
      Being an “imaginative” child, which meant that I had already spun a huge number of tall tales to get me out or, more often, into of all sorts of jams, I thought maybe if I could wire all the radios together I could listen in on a conversation between some of Houston's Finest chasing beer-bellied robbers with raccoon masks and stripped tees or perhaps the Secret Service with their cool sunglasses and pockets brimming with Man from U.N.C.L.E. gadgets was even now eying balconies for hidden assassins nearby, or maybe some Martians were orbiting right above sprawling Houston, searching in vain for leaders to be taken to who would not be nonplussed by their green skin, multiple antennae, and oddly-shaped heads.
      I found the requisite number of old radios, took out the backs of them, and after finding some spare wire and wire cutters, I wired them all together. Then came the moment of truth. I plugged one in, and immediately all the electricity in the house went out.
      Now you need to remember that this was summer in Texas, well, in Houston, Texas, where life as we know it was impossible before freon was invented. Before freon made air-conditioned life possible only a few could survive Houston's subtropical sauna-bath-like annual summer meltdowns.
As far as I knew, the whole city had gone dark and all that wonderful life-giving cool air had stopped, too.
      At the Astrodome, the Eighth Wonder of the World, the National League's perennial doormats, the (Dis)Astros, playing a day game with no natural light, were totally blacked out right after Don Wilson threw a strikeout and radio announcer Loel Passe had only time to say, “He breeeeezed him, one more . . .”      
     At the Medical Center, Michael DeBakey was stopped in mid-cut, his sharpened scalpel frozen above someone's sternum; Mission Control, just a few miles to the south, was going dark just as a Gemini astronaut was floating into space; and all over the city technicolor movies were stopped in mid-scenes.      
     For all I knew, all because of my foolishness, riots in cinemas were now occurring, angry patrons with slick backed hair and tight Levis were throwing spare Milk Duds, popcorn, and Goobers at ducking ushers while white screens were being ripped apart by a colorful fusillade of Dots as hard as rocks.
      Since I had been raised the right way, incredible spasms of guilt began to shoot through my very soul. But suddenly all my guilt disappeared to be replaced by my second most common emotion, fear. I heard my father's footsteps outside my door. I knew it was his steps. His heavy patent leather footfalls of his Florshiem wingtips were by then etched into my young brain.
      I also knew that I was or soon would be dead because his belt and I would become one. But something truly amazing happened before I was read my last rites. My dad came in my room still dressed for work, though his tie now was loose and his suit rumpled. He didn't say anything. He didn't need to. He just looked at me askance, his thick eyebrows making two question marks, my signal that I needed to answer and PDQ.
      I'm ashamed to say it, but I hadn't the time for an elaborate lie, so I was forced against my usual practice to stick with the truth. I told him everything, and the truly weird thing was that he thought it was just hilarious. He kept asking me over and over to tell him why I wanted to wire the radios together. He loved the part about the Martians.
      I looked at my dad's face turning red from laughter and wondered if the scorching Houston sun had baked his brains or maybe being stuck in the endless traffic of the Gulf Freeway had made any diversion funny, even his only son causing a massive blackout.
      Whatever the reason was for his unusual forbearance, he escorted me out to the backyard to show me the fuse box. He then educated me on the ins and out of fuses, an important lesson, but more importantly I learned that day a bit about patience and compassion.
      At 56, I am all-too aware of my own failings – that I have not always measured up to my father's example. Even so, that day he left me an important standard. That though I had done something potentially dangerous and certainly dumb as a box of rocks, my father took pity on my young self as I confessed to him the honest truth. Truly it's a wonder he could hear me; my knees were knocking so much.

   

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Dad from Uncle

http://www.fwweekly.com/2013/06/19/dad-from-u-n-c-l-e/

When I was young back in Houston in the ’60s, summer was endless and sometimes dangerous. Boredom hadn’t been invented yet. We didn’t have devices to store thousands of songs and regurgitate them with all the clarity of a gramophone. We didn’t have cell phones that took really, really bad pictures. Yet somehow our lives were still worth living.

Saturday, March 2, 2013

2 poems at Blue Lake Review

http://bluelakereview.weebly.com/2-by-ken-wheatcroft-pardue.html

The Blue Guitarist
 
He's a singer without a song.
Last night his notes
just packed up and flew
under the metal door . . .

 . . .   and . . .

It is What it is

I've worn down an even half dozen of carpets
to threadbare, church mouse thickness,
proctoring, urging, mentoring, cajoling
my charges . . .

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

The Step Down Revolution of Ted Cruz

      Texas elected its first Hispanic senator on July 31st. Of course, Republican Ted Cruz has to face his Democratic challenger Paul Sadler come November, but in Texas we all know that's merely a technicality.
      So what kind of senator will Ted Cruz be? Since he's never held elective office, it's hard to know really. All we have to go by is his campaign rhetoric. While it's no news that what someone angling for political office says may not match what they do once in office, it's all we've got, so we have to take what he says at face value.
      In May in a speech to a Tea Party Express rally in front of the state capitol, Cruz, I hope by accident, quoted Bob Dylan when he said that “revolution was in the air.” But this is not your granddaddy's revolution for equality and democracy, it is instead a return to a mythic 18th century America where all the Framers felt the same about limited-government so that you wonder what exactly did they debate in Philadelphia during the scorching summer of 1787 for four months.
      Talking to Tea Party sympathizers, I'm always amazed at their tenuous grasp of American history. Those contemporaries of Madison who were for a strong federal government, like Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist Party, disappear as if by magic. And while they insist on Madisonian government, they forget that Madison was a notoriously weak President who led us into a disastrous war against the British, and who very importantly had a complete change of heart about the efficacy of limited-government after the War of 1812. Yes, that Madison, whose name is repeated like a mantra at Tea Party gatherings, became a backer of a strong federal government.
      But in Austin, playing to the loud and profane cheers of the Madisonian Tea Party crowd, Cruz insisted on limited government. He would, he said, get rid of the Departments of Education, Commerce, and Energy. But he wouldn't be content with just gutting a fifth of the cabinet, he'd give the National Endowment of Arts and the IRS the boot, too. And to top it off, he'd audit the Fed and limit the power of the EPA.
      These proposals are, to put it mildly, extreme. They represent a fringe element of the Republican party that is, at least in Texas, now ascendant. But while the rabble-rousing words of a practiced orator like Ted Cruz will elicit cheers at any gathering of the Tea Party faithful, governing is not a political rally or a debate society. Speeches filled with glittering generalities like “liberty,” “freedom,” and “independence” may sound awe-inspiring to those who believe that what we need to cure our 21st century woes is a “return” to limited 18th century Madisonian government; but in a country of more than 300 million people with a 21st century global economy, what Cruz proposes is not only unworkable but dangerous.
      Our most pressing problem today is our unacceptably high unemployment, effectively at 15%. A competent and responsive government would now be doing all it could to get people back to work. To do otherwise is cruel and unnecessary. In Paul Krugman's End This Depression Now, the Nobel-prize winning economist makes the case that the Great Depression taught us how to get out of a downturn in the economy. So our government's main objective now should be to prime the economic pump, but it is failing at this, not nearly enough has been done.
      And who's to blame for our government's inadequate response? According to economist Daniel Altman's Sabotage: How the Republican Party Crippled America's Economic Recovery, cynical Republicans in Congress are sabotaging the economy by holding up Obama's jobs bills. To what end? Why only to win the 2012 election, the American people be damned.
      If the federal government had been allowed to help the states and other localities keep their public sector jobs, unemployment would be much lower, and our economy would be well on its way to recovery. But while we are mired in double-digit unemployment, Cruz's ideology would not allow him to do any thing about it, only to push for deeper and deeper austerity. Think of England and Ireland, whose economies have lately shrunk, as prime evidence as to the destructiveness of that idea.
      And what of those resonant words spoken by Cruz, liberty and freedom? If the EPA is curtailed, we will have the liberty to breathe even more polluted air than we breathe now. If Obamacare is repealed, as Cruz desires, than the uninsured among us will have the freedom to be denied coverage for preexisting conditions and to die, I suppose. Some freedom? Some liberty?
And while any Republican senator Texas elected would be conservative, Cruz says he's on the side of no compromise. So we will have yet one more Tea Party Senator to gum up the works, to continue the ineffectiveness of the do-nothing 112th Congress, which in the words of long-time Capitol Hill observer Norm Ornstein is the worst Congress ever. Brilliant!
      In a sane world, Texas, a majority-minority state with its most populous counties (Harris, Bexar, and Dallas) Democratic, would have a true two-party race for the Senate. But barring a small miracle, we are fated to be represented by an inexperienced ideologue, beholden to a fringe of the Republican party, whose main experience in government is, as Texas' solicitor-general, arguing for the trivial (a ten commandments monument) or the illogically cruel (trying to convince the Supremes that even though Texas had made a mistake when it sent Michael Haley to prison for 14 years for the high crime of stealing a calculator from Wal-Mart, that he still should not be released). It's fitting somehow that Texas is a red state. We all should be red from the sheer embarrassment of it all.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Not All Texans are Idiots: Annette Sanford: A Tribute


      The image of Texas has been besmirched as of late, from the decidedly not-ready-for-prime-time Rick Perry's fiasco of a presidential campaign to his recent channeling of George Wallace and blocking needy Texans from getting the health care they deserve, all so he can look tough to the mean-spirited and ignorant, otherwise known as the Republican base.
      Or, take Ted (I'm a nut-job) Nugent (Pulease!), from his paranoid blather at an NRA gathering to his suggestion that maybe the wrong side won the Civil War. Huh? To an outsider, it must seem that Texas is populated by right-wing, gun-toting, fundamentalist, homophobic, Neanderthal, know-nothings. I can't blame anyone for thinking that, since I live here, and sometimes I think it, too.
      Yet the truth is Texas is no cultural or intellectual backwater. We're home to a bevy of top-flight museums, research universities, fine dining, and other accoutrements of cosmopolitan life. The fact is a number of damn-fine writers also hail from our state, Mary Karr and Larry McMurtry, to name two. But the problem is we don't trumpet our best and brightest, just our dumber and dumberers.
      A case in point is this past January. One of our best Texas writers, Annette Sanford died, and I've been surprised that not much has been written to honor this gem of Texas letters. Maybe that's because she was, as Clay Smith once described her in the Austin Chronicle, “a deceptively simple writer.” Her best stories creep up on you like morning glory vines and before you know it you're surrounded by a kind of rough-hewn beauty often in a place you least expected. As writer Kathryn Eastburn wrote, she was “Texas's Eudora Welty, as fine a short story writer as anyone of her generation.”
      I didn't know Annette well. I remember only meeting her twice, but for me at least those meetings were important, if not providential. In 1989 I was a newbie high school English teacher at Victoria's Stroman High School undergoing the usual baptism of fire reserved for first year teachers.
      I will never forget that first day meeting my last period senior CLA (low-level) English class. Think Welcome Back, Kotter's sweathogs and you'd have a pretty good approximation of them. But, of course, this was the eighties, and all the girls had their hair teased up to what looked like to me a foot or more. And they all wore black clothes with dark eyeliner globbed on so thickly they looked like a casting call for the Bride of Frankenstein.
      On that first day my rookie knees were sure shaking, but, as has fortunately happened to me more often than not in my career, I grew to love my, as I wryly called them, pre-crime class. But, even so, when we started a career unit in the spring, I knew I needed more than divine intervention to get them, in the throes of senioritis, to do anything, much less a research paper in which they had to interview someone in the career to which they aspired. I figured I better to do an interview myself to show them it could be done.
So without a lot of thought, I realized I needed to find a writer nearby because that's what I've always wanted to do. That's when I decided to interview Annette Sanford. She was close, only about 40 miles away, and through my wife's family, I had a connection of sorts. Her brother, the late artist Charles Schorre, was a good friend of my wife's parents.
      It worked out, and on one of those beautiful crystal clear Gulf Coast spring days that are so sweet because they're so rare, my wife, 4-year old daughter, and I drove north on I-59 from Victoria to the sleepy hamlet of Ganado, Texas.
      There Annette greeted us at her door. She was a little more serious than I would've hoped, even stand-offish. She'd every right to be wary of us, since I was acting like some kind of literary groupie coming to ask that question all real writers hate: how do I do what you did?
      But taking my daughter, a 3-year old blond bundle of energy, proved fortuitous. Her presence melted Annette's heart. Annette sat us down and served us lemonade with old-fashioned sugar cookies with such aplomb that my daughter would remember it for years later.
      We also got to know Lukey, her husband. He was a big man, a retired letter carrier, equal parts earnest and self-effacing. You could understand how, as Annette explained to me later, he served as a counselor of sorts to some of the less-than centered writers who frequented writing conferences they attended together. I could just imagine him setting some confused somebody straight.
      He showed my daughter his huge jigsaw puzzle he was working on on a fold-out table in the living room and invited her to help. Truly, it was like a scene from one of Annette's stories where the older and wiser couple takes care of the younger and decidedly not-so-wise couple.
      After awhile Annette and I went back to her study behind her house to talk shop. She admitted she wasn't a quick writer; that it always took her a long time to get everything right. But she did get it right more often than not because her writing sticks with you. It's been years since I've read her stories, but I could never in a million years forget the sassy narrator of a “Trip in a Summer Dress,” and Miss Ettie of “Limited Access,” who because she wasn't born to let things waste, must watch TV 24-7.
      That afternoon Annette gave me some advice that's always stuck with me. She said that a writer had to get used to rejection. Her advice was to put each rejection on the wall, not to be scared of them but proud of them because they were badges of honor. I know that I haven't let my many rejections stop me. In fact, since Annette's been one of the few real writers who has encouraged me, I figure it's because of her that I still harbor any delusion that I can write.
      The last time we met was 1990 when she read some of her stories to my juniors. Since car chases or drive-bys was not Annette's forte, I had some trepidations. My usually antsy students, I thought, might get bored and embarrass themselves and me. But instead they acted like angels, sitting quietly as Annette read in her genteel Southern drawl, beautiful, demure, and bitingly intelligent, reminiscent of accents heard in a Horton Foote movie, like something from another time.
      After she read, I escorted her out of my class. Then in the hall all hell broke loose. Kids were screaming at each other, acting their absolute worst. I can't remember exactly when it was, but replaying it in my head I figure it must have been right before a holiday. I was embarrassed, but if Annette noticed she didn't let on.
      Like the 25-year veteran high school English teacher she was, she wore a calm smile as she walked through the bedlam. And that's another reason Annette Sanford has meant so much to me. She was not only a top-notch writer but a damn good high school English teacher, I suspect. I was more than lucky to have met her. When she died, not only the Texas literary world but the wider literary world lost a real gem. I just wish more people would have noticed.